Comments on: Trading What? http://blog.cnaughton.com/2004/07/16/trading-what/ babblings! Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:04:15 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0 by: never you mind who this is http://blog.cnaughton.com/2004/07/16/trading-what/#comment-178 Tue, 03 Aug 2004 20:39:36 +0000 http://blog.cnaughton.com/2004/07/16/trading-what/#comment-178 Thanks, I'd appreciate smaller words. Thanks, I’d appreciate smaller words.

]]> by: DrBacchus http://blog.cnaughton.com/2004/07/16/trading-what/#comment-177 Tue, 03 Aug 2004 20:02:22 +0000 http://blog.cnaughton.com/2004/07/16/trading-what/#comment-177 No, *I* an calling reality shows perverse. Particularly this one. Glorifying the role of peeping tom to a national pasttime is a perversion. What you did say is that blogging about it "gives it more recognition than it deserves", as though, somehow, if things don't deserve recognition, it's better to pretend that they are not happening. I tend to be of the opinion that things like this *should* be held up to the light, so that the world can see the absurdities that they are participating in. I'm sorry my earlier remarks were unclear enough to be misunderstood. I'll try to use smaller words next time. No, *I* an calling reality shows perverse. Particularly this one. Glorifying the role of peeping tom to a national pasttime is a perversion.

What you did say is that blogging about it “gives it more recognition than it deserves”, as though, somehow, if things don’t deserve recognition, it’s better to pretend that they are not happening. I tend to be of the opinion that things like this *should* be held up to the light, so that the world can see the absurdities that they are participating in.

I’m sorry my earlier remarks were unclear enough to be misunderstood. I’ll try to use smaller words next time.

]]> by: never you mind who this is http://blog.cnaughton.com/2004/07/16/trading-what/#comment-176 Tue, 03 Aug 2004 18:05:05 +0000 http://blog.cnaughton.com/2004/07/16/trading-what/#comment-176 I didn't recommend "ignoring the problem". Nor did i suggest that blogging about perversion supports perversion. In fact, I don't think I called reality shows perverse. Nice. Thanks for playing, though. I didn’t recommend “ignoring the problem”. Nor did i suggest that blogging about perversion supports perversion. In fact, I don’t think I called reality shows perverse. Nice. Thanks for playing, though.

]]> by: DrBacchus http://blog.cnaughton.com/2004/07/16/trading-what/#comment-175 Fri, 23 Jul 2004 19:09:35 +0000 http://blog.cnaughton.com/2004/07/16/trading-what/#comment-175 Um ... yeah. If we ignore the problem, it's sure to go away. I hardly think that blogging about perversion in any way supports the perversion. I saw an ad for this on a television in a store I was in this week. I'm not sure I had quite believed it before that. Makes me glad I never watch television any more. Um … yeah. If we ignore the problem, it’s sure to go away. I hardly think that blogging about perversion in any way supports the perversion.

I saw an ad for this on a television in a store I was in this week. I’m not sure I had quite believed it before that. Makes me glad I never watch television any more.

]]> by: never you mind who this is http://blog.cnaughton.com/2004/07/16/trading-what/#comment-171 Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:59:10 +0000 http://blog.cnaughton.com/2004/07/16/trading-what/#comment-171 you are whacked. totally whacked. Trading spouses is just another mindless scripted "reality" show and you blogging on about it just gives it more recognition than it deserves. I say, "give america what it deserves... more inane television". And this isn't just the medication talking here... you are whacked. totally whacked. Trading spouses is just another mindless scripted “reality” show and you blogging on about it just gives it more recognition than it deserves. I say, “give america what it deserves… more inane television”. And this isn’t just the medication talking here…

]]>